Search results

I skied um last year at the on snow demo at Copper. The funny thing about them was I didnt even notice them. I was 'skiing the skis' so to speak. I guess it cant be bad that if you ride um you dont even notice um, in fact that is a good thing. I could tell you that if SARS didnt hit, I'd be on...

I think that most people do have more than just the one pair of skis, since most people do more than one kind of skiing. I’ve got the Line 1260s for park, the Line Skogens for all mountain, and Line Motherships for big mountain. But for most people it comes down to money. But the investment into...

Hey what does everyone think about the Line cargos. Should they bring um back, and would you buy them? Would you still wear um if you didnt ski Lines? BECAUSE SKIING NEEDS A FUTURE.

^^So hot want to touch the hinny!^^ BECAUSE SKIING NEEDS A FUTURE.

I’ve got the 177. They are sweet. Extremely light, full twin, and super snappy with the new carbon band in um. People say they aren’t so good out of the park, but on groomers I still can carve just fine. However on chunky snow the same snap off the lip gets um moving around a little under the...

I don't know if its cause I'm all 'Go USA!' right now since my brother is over in Iraq, but Id have to say the Line Skogens with the WWII 'nose art' style. I'd like to think it pays tribute to all of those that have givin their lives for us to do what we love, Ski. BECAUSE SKIING NEEDS A FUTURE.

All I know is that Intrawest resorts have kickass parks, and they just took over Winter Park! Rock On! BECAUSE SKIING NEEDS A FUTURE.

Sara Burke or Kristi Leskinen? I know its kinda like the Ginger, Mary Ann thing. Id have to go with Sara! BECAUSE SKIING NEEDS A FUTURE.

Nope. The WP ticket works at MJ too. BECAUSE SKIING NEEDS A FUTURE.

Id say the Pollard's would a good ski for ya as long as the length is ok. Other wise the 172 Motherships would be great too, if you needed a short ski, and they have a 90 waist.

The 1260s this year are sick, super light, true twin tip, super snappy with the Carbon Band. The only thing that the 1080s have going for it is the width out of the park. But over all as a park ski, the 1260s.

Believe it or not, all of them are. They all have an influence in the industry. That is needed to keep huge companies like Rossi and Salomon from telling us what we should be doing. They have the money, they had the strong arm in skiing. But thanks to these three companies its back in the skiers...

I heard from the Dalbello Rep at a ski show that Seth is planning on using Glenn Plake’s boot by them when it comes out. My understanding of the Line boot is that the company was so focused on getting the Reactor binding just right that they put off the boot, and allot of the softgoods to do it...

Its not always the ski, more than not its the skier. I love my Lines. All of them. They all have a different purpose, you cant take the 1260s out in the backcountry and expect them to be as good as the motherships. So that’s why they have 9 different models to choose from. But allot of it is the...

I skied them last season at Copper for the on snow demo. They are sweet for rippin on. They are super stiff, and ride smooth. I have skied the Crossmax before and think they are allot alike.

Darksides are sweet for groomers and even in some pow. Otherwise the New Line ski the fx7.3 are sweet on the groomers. But the Mavericks would be a great ski too.

More than likely youd have to go to a ski trade show, or on snow demo. I dont think there for sale. So youd have to get hooked up from a rep, or a rider rep.

I think it all depends on how hard you push yourself. The Mavericks are a solid all mountain ski. While the Pro Models are more for the aggressive skier, and the right one really depends on you; Height, Weight etc. But an over-all winner with 50-50 ridding is the Skogens.

Hey I ride for Dragon. The Mx are for a wider face and the Foil (kickass) are for a slightly narrower face. But as far as the lens quality goes, if you think Oakley is the best, then you would like Dragon. Theres a rumor that Oakley makes the lens for Dragon, and might even own them too.