Search results

Then you'll find a majority of 16th century continental philosophy somewhat frustrating.

I don't agree with Berkeley, but he's worth a read because of his stance on idealism. Most of us are monists (those who believe in either material or immaterial substance), but I am, as you appear to be, a materialist, as opposed to an idealist like Berkeley. Still, it's an interesting position.

George Berkeley argues, as he is an idealist, that sound is a sensation and therefore does not exist outside of the mind. For all of you arguing that sound is a vibrative or undulatory motion in the air, is it not absurd that sound in this sense is explained through the idea of motion, an idea...

Tomorrow, I'm getting into this little debate. At the moment, I'm too tired.

Exactly, that is the key to driving manual. Some cars have high clutches, some cars have low clutches. Automatic cars give you a license to steer, however Manual cars give you a license to drive.

Sealed.

It's got nothing to do with Xbox Live, go back a step. You're playing CoD 4 on an Xbox, buy a PS3. Problem solved.

Hahaha, that's original.

Just remember... 'It's not rape, it's surprise sex!'

That game is amazing.

Your objection is misguided. He isn't arguing for the existence of climate change; he clearly states that no such argument can be given and that the balance of evidence favours 'climate change agnosticism'. He is contending that despite the epistemic irrationality of choosing column A, if you...

I never thought that I'd see the day when Pascal's Wager was applied to climate change.

CoD 4 > Uncharted > Asassin's Creed, however the latter two are quite similar gameplay-wise. Haven't played SKATE, but I'd highly recommend CoD 4, we had a drunken multiplayer sesh last night and enjoyed ourselves immensely. I go by 'Philonous' on the Playstation network, and would also like an...

Oooh...

Solid goggles, they fitted my huge face perfectly.

Australia.

I agree with this. As it stands at the moment, there is a plethera of data/literature that can be used by either side to form/support their various theories and whatnot. Although I'm a climate change skeptic insofar as our impact/ability to do anything about climate change, surely an approach...

If any of you take anything away from this thread, realise that water vapour IS responsible for 75% of the greenhouse effect.

I don't tend to defend emo, just attack peoples ignorance.