Search results

well, I guess that must be proof of your 'No Life' Status. Just kidding. When I talk about speed though, I mean how does it handle speed in terms of squirliness. I'm not familiar with armada's at all in terms of speed, or anthing else from volkls. And yea it is kind of a big difference in terms...

how do the p3's compare? softer harder? weaker stronger? faster slower? and yes, ar6's are the shit

yea I thought about the PC but I don't want to wreck it on a rail or bust em in a season and then get no warranty or they cant replace them because all 500 pairs are sold.

anyone know how fast the ar6's are? like if I wanna blast the occaisonal straightline will I be moving or just look like some idiot who can't turn?

mogul aka bump

yea, some days all I want to do is scoot down those long easy greens that feel more like a smooth hike than a 'run' with no one else around except my closest friends, just talking cooling off and buttering around or riding switch. That's the funnest feeling in the world - being with your friends...

mogul/bump

So how fast are the ar6's? Will I be able to keep up with my snowboarder friends who are probably 30% park and 70% all mountain? also, any suggestions on bindings and where to mount?

I'm the same but I'd say go 176, longer -in my opinion- is only going to give you a heavier, bulkier ski than you'll want. More swing weight and even though it adds weight it's still made out of the same stuff, so it won't do that much to dampen it - rather when you go of a jump you'll feel the...

cool. so, ar6 is it then. My EC all mountian/little hill and park ski for the next 2 seasons at least. I figure I'll go 176. If there's anything else speak now or forever hold your penis

tm's or ar6's any reasons which is better?

bump tm's or ar6's? they seem to be what I'm lookin for

now between the pc, thall, and ar6? I'm leaning towards the pc's because they have the rase base and my buddies like to go fast when not in the park, but any reason to go with the other guys?

cool, I was kinda hoping the armadas would be as good as I wanted them to be beacause I hate all these white skis everyone's coming out with. Can't see which damn way I'm pointed if I hit a bump or something, and now my dad can call my skis ugly... he rides classics

sounds like alot of armada, but if you screw up your skis do they take care of you or are they built well enough to get hammered?

It'd help to now things like -how are they in the air? +swing weight? +landings? +switch? -Speed? +fast/slow? +dampness? -Durability? +warranteed for rails? +soft/hard base? +edges? Keep in mind I'm skiing EC groomers/sometimes icy but always hard snow and dicking around in...

so if I counted the number of suggestions right now the triplets have it by one or two over the karmas over the TM's. But I'm skeptical, after all look at the 2004 election. It'd be really helpful if anyone who's ridden one or more of the skis that are being suggested could compare or contrast...

yea but no one is saying why yet. What I'd really benefit from is something like "Well the t-halls are a lot poppier than the chronics, but you lose the dampness at speed" rather than things like "Karma's with looks" or just saying setups that people would buy for themselves if they had the...

hovering under 6' tall 150ish pounds Ski park and eastcoast conditions (no pow) looking for ski and bindings to kill it with Open to all suggestions just say WHY please don't bother if you haven't ridden them yet

How bout ol Fred