Search results

i broke my 169s, but they are getting warrantied as we speak

ben, are you going to school?

i have the STLs (177), which i am venturing to say are pretty similar, although i have never been on the thalls. so i am making this post based off the fact that they are pretty much the same. the stls rip in the park, like nothing i have ever dreamed of. as for taking them out of the park, not...

yeah, austin has scratches, he moved out to boulder though, thats why he never rides brighton

i heard the same thing

dope teaser

i rode the 169s. i snaped mine, but i loved them before that happened.

same as TM, but different graphics. im pretty sure the bases dont alternate though.

definately tanners, especially if they are mostly for park

yeah, i have the 177s. they are super soft. freaking awesome in park. i was a little dissapointed in its all mountain capabilities since they are my only ski, but you cant expect much from a park specific ski.

yeah, she was pretty smokin

i know tanner fell, but that five he threw with the double japan thing was SICK!

not a big fan, sorry

mt brighton is about a 1/2 hour away

definately a dope goggle, way comfy and stylish

wierd about the graphics, and those new oakleys are so ugly

'IT IS A SKIER TAKING ADVANTAGE OF WACK JUDGING' that is the whole idea of a comp. throw what you think the judges want to see. the judges thought that gagniers run was better. as for the 1 footer, they arent for everybody, i definately dont want to see every kid on the hill using it, but for...

to bad about lars, he is a sick skier. way to go 4frnt, that makes me glad i bought a pair.

i just got them today, after putting them on i was totally inpressed. they look and feel awesome. i will let you know how they are once i get on the hill with them.

simplicity is the way to go for the most part. k2 is the only company that has proved me otherwise.