Search results

DSLRs that are good for sequences: 20D 30D Mark II,III D200 D2XS D2HS D40, D50, D70, D80, Rebels, 5D, 1DS are not fast enough for a good sequence.

I claim, ya, good stuff...

quoting apple "Choose the glossy widescreen display to make your graphics, photos, and videos appear with richer colors and deeper blacks" Matte is anti-glare and more accurate.

Where I learned to ski.

From now it's luv and hugs. BTW Dr. Phil told me the same thing.

oh its real and has a 220 degree view angle. Basically it see behind itself.

This one is pretty sicko too. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmnjdOri-ig&mode=related&search=

"Everyone else can rip someone for writing something stupid, but when I do it, I'm a douche."

Leave the great lord out of this! JK I'm just keepin it real. Ever one else can rip someone for writing something stupid, but when I do it, I'm a douche. Maybe I'll change my name to furryloveimaging to soften my harsh, cock-like attitude. You don't have to be MF to know the basics.

You mean that in a loving way, right?

I meant to throw a JK in there, I was just funnin around. I haven't quite worked up to the $6000+ lenses.

They're called battery grips now, but in the olden days when we used to shoot film there was actually a motor drive you could stick on the bottom of some cams to shoot faster. That concludes today's history of photography lesson.

For sequences you need at least 5fps. That spec was unavailable from Sony or anywhere else.

Wow, I can't believe I have to explain this. Check the heading up top "Post your camera set up" not "Post your school's set up" I wasn't pwning your pic, just merely stating that the 200 would suffer a great deal from adding the 2X compared to the 400. The 400 pwns the 200 converted, not my...

that

catsup

whore

Rush is so far down the list of greatest bands ever. This thread makes me sick.

I heard for some. They're great.