Search results

i rode the 189s. id say theyre def more jump oriented, maybe a bit of jibbing, but its not gonna be that responsive for technical changeups on rails. id lean more to slow spins than fast 10s, but its not unrealistic. its def more all mountain jibbing than true park, and even then, more jumps...

seconded.

haha i kno they make a super dope all mountain ski for a smaller skier, especially good in powder. thing is, im 6'5 and 200 lbs, so to me, park only, id crush them trying to ski them all mountain, actually, id crush them anywhere, shame, i do love soft skis.

110, lizzies are true park skis, the flex is so soft they barely can be anything else. but with the amount of people skiing anthems, arvs, mrs, kung fujas and the like in the park, ur seeing an uptick on slightly wider stuff. big influx on the 90-95 waisted park skis.

they are in fact new molds, i was sure to ask tim petrick (vp of k2) when he made the trip to my shop, as i was curious about that myself. now, it is a medium soft tip, with a medium tail. its public enemy/extreme beefy, fairly thick profile, riveted tip and tail, standard sidewall, no abs...

he's in that gray area that when u combine two products that should self destruct, they magically hold up forever. its magic and the jester is a combination of other bindings. the heel piece is taken from the axial2 design, and the two piece uses the sideways mounted spring from the reactor.

mine are white, they usually do opposite bases with everything else, so it makes sense.

so true

i broke some teeth mountain biking, and now wear one for that, and have every intention to wear it skiing too

impossible to tell if it polarized without seeing it in person. to me it looks more like black iridium tho, mirrored finnish

yea, theyre in eastern pa and do good business. theyre my primary competitor, but they are a really legit shop. we have it in my shop as well, and id be willing to ship it no problem, but no online purchasing really. shoot me a pm if your interested.

thanks man, im in a binding zone today. im just excited because we started getting more ski customers in my shop this weekend than bike customers. im pumped, time to spew some knowledge.

the problem with demoing twins is they werent designed to have a demo binding put on them, and they ski differently because of it. that being said, i tell like 30% of the people who come into my shop to demo before they buy, just to get a feel for things, especially if they a) dont trust my...

sth sits lower to the ski, but a few important points... 1) more elastic travel from the jesters. will feel more secure in the binding, much more solid contact 2) wider footprint. having the wider mounting point will help control a fatter ski, more power to ur edges and much less likely to...

178 octoland anthems 183 blends 182 bacons (duh, one length) 185 ep pros (again, duh.) may add in chronics for pipe? we shall see.

din is basically the universal standard measurement for the release tension on a binding. really, how much force it takes before the boot pops out. its measure by a machine in three directions (right, left, up) as for the right binding, i too am i rossi/look guy and recommend the px12s or axial...

because of your price range, id look at pimps from last year (same ski) or bluehouse districts, as theyre on sale. either one is gonna be dope.

^that makes sense to me, but not really for the reasons he said. walls are a stiffer flex, symmetrical ski thats still playful. they rip all mountain and rule park. after they break in a bit, they butter quite well, but are really torsionally stiff, which a burly vertical sidewall thats gonna...

agreed. im bigger than most people riding anthems, 6'5 200 lbs and beat them pretty good and they held up well. they dont have a whole lot of chamber left, but like i said, i beat them up and im a big guy

sessions