Search results

word

i accidentally posted this with my friends account so everyone just pm me.

he toe on my fks 120s has way too much forward lean, so if someone could sell me their toe lifters and hardware for like $10-$20 that would be great.

I have DuMonts now im looking for something a little bit stiffer the same/more width less sidecut more durability low swing weight a little lighter overall (not a huge issue) I ride 88% park, mostly rails, 10% trees, 2% the rest.

yeah i missed the weight. i completely agree, fks 120 would be prime. but as i said bufore, for 99% park the shock absorber in the toe may be helpful. the z12s are not the most durable bindings and if hes throwing it down in the park run after run he may want something that will last longer...

hes scared of the width. also it sems like overkill because 90% of the time he skis at a hil with ~300' vertical rise

hestra/pow/dakine(although dakines arent very durable)

what do you mean by the "higher end ones?" all px12s are px12s. (i guess you could count the tis/higher din ones different but not really. also, i think anyone who has them would agree that the fks series is more durable.

yeah that should be fine. good choice

however, all of my frinds who have had px12s have had chronic brake problems

yeah but hes like: "i dont know... im not sure i want to mount center... im worried they wont ski good out west, im worried theyll suck in pow... im worried about etc..." also, the jibs are in the intermediate width range, and he want something in the 85-93 waist range. not to mention that lots...

yeah id say fks 120 if you can stand the lower din, the 155/185 are also great, but those are alot heavier. i dont know as much about the marker jesters or sth 16s but they may be a good option if you ski a higher din. however, keep in mind that the fks 120s have ALOT of forward lean so you may...

fks 120 come to mind. theyre like .5 lbs lighter than px12s. also sth12 or z12 may also be a good choise depending on how hard you ride.

reno he is hesitant for a symetrical ski, dont ask me why.

im 6' and use 34" poles. i find that tiny poles are a perfect compromise between no poles and poles.

These are for my friend. he skis 75% park 20% all-mtn 5% shallow pow is 135 lbs is 5'8" has public enemys now in a 159 and wants a bit lighter ski that has a little more flexibility but is still stiff enough to keep its own out west (he lives in wisconsin)

fuck. no.

its not

ratatat-stomp ratatat-tacobel canan dl incognito-live in my element sizzla-jah protect my life the notorious BIG-party and bullshit (dirty harry remix)

where? show me.