i've never ridden scotts, but they're a solid goggle and pole company. apparently scott's skis are good? i feel like amplid was better, scott is like another racing company trying to expand their company and make more money by getting into park. maybe i'm wrong.
I remember scott making their first pair of twintips. they where heavy as shit and there didn't excist any pop. but hey, Henrik Harlaut had scott as his first sponsor and I remember him doing switch 10's with them skis. and htis is about 4 years ago. I think they have made some better skis by then. and I remember seing tom the crew cruising hood this summer. didn't tom use the p3's then? my opinion is that amplid IS tom, you know? tom made amplid famous and everyone wanted amplid. but it just ramains to see how scott's going. the skis look dope and with toms if tom likes them, i like them. haha. but yeah, tom is prolly making mor money out of riding for scott. if he can only get a contract with red bull r rockstar he will really see some money flowting in.
yeh scott and twall, thats dope, i had p3s in 178 last year and they ruled, have any of you haters even ever ridden scott freestyle skis? ...i love scott skis...and i guess twall is okay too lol
Congrats to tom for moving forward with his career, i think he made a great move switching over to a bigger company but i just don't see why this is front page main article material. I mean if this can make front page then shouldn't there be rider profiles on NS? Or are we NS'ers all put into one giant assumed "t-wall dicksucking group"? No hate just curious
cool beans. i really like the topsheet on this years p3's and i like scott as a company but the lawsuit with ON3P about the "great scott" is really quite ridiculous.