River Rock Pools

The water in the middle makes it ugly, I was trying to keep the shutter speeds high (because the wind was shaking my tripod) so I couldn't go for like a 1sec exposure at ISO100. This shot was ISO400, f11 at around a 1/50th exposure.

deep...naw not really. and get rid of the gay logo.

^ Dude... it's like 1/100th of the image on the bottom right corner... how about i NOT remove it?

Any intelligent comments?

this pic gives quite much to look at.different textures like the sky, streaming water and still water in the pool.good contrast between the sky and the shadows.only bad thing, as you said, is the effect what ISO400 made.

and ECfreeski, shut up man.every photographer has a right to add copyrightmark to their pics cause it's the thing what tells you who really took the pic.of course it must be small enough(like steves logo) and it must not get too much attention(as steves logo).so could you please tell what's wrong with this one?

...stupid bitch...

its good but there aren't any suddle colors that you usually see in your photos. but its good. i like it.

i didnt say it takes up too much room, i said itsa little fruity looking. and no ones gonna steal this pic and claim it for their own, i know that.
...stupid bitch...

aren't any subtle colours? That made no sense.

And ECfreeski3... you'd be surprised how often people steal photos and clame them as their own.
...stupid bitch...

someone has stolen one of ur photos? i doubt it. and anyway, i can personlly guarantee no one will take this one. wrong sectiom by the way.
...stupid bitch...

wrong section, what!? Steve's right about people stealing photos. Who's to say that nobody would take this? It's a very good shot.

ECfreeski3 i guess you wouldent know about any one stealing photos cause well put it this way you phots suck and if you knew how to edit photos it wouldent kill your quailty... so if any ones stupid its you... plus you dont have to worrie about people stealin you photo because it sucks... and it isnt just the quality