a.jamieson Dec 31, 1969 to be honest...not so good man... lacking steeze and its sad that you wasted some good follow cams on such shit skiers
to be honest...not so good man... lacking steeze and its sad that you wasted some good follow cams on such shit skiers
JayDope Dec 31, 1969 ^ this stuff was from 03-05, he had some skills for skiing back then, and i bet hes even better now, shut ur mouth
^ this stuff was from 03-05, he had some skills for skiing back then, and i bet hes even better now, shut ur mouth
S S SkiingNinja Dec 31, 1969 ^^you are an asshole. that follow cam 5 was pretty sick and i saw some rodeo 5s and stuff too.
C C CMoynihan Dec 31, 1969 your rails were a bit lacking but that last mute five showed a ton of potential/
E E eightsk84e9 Dec 31, 1969 u need for steeze, and that edit was so haggard, and the camera man sucked i couldnt see wut u wer doin of jumps with the glare and u style blows, oh and ten8ty ur a fagot so shut the fuck up
u need for steeze, and that edit was so haggard, and the camera man sucked i couldnt see wut u wer doin of jumps with the glare and u style blows, oh and ten8ty ur a fagot so shut the fuck up
CHARLES.BRONSON Dec 31, 1969 WAS THAT MIKE NICK???? <br> <br> that jump on seymour was good times, perfect angles