Matt McGinnis

C

• C

  c.vayko

• Dec 31, 1969

sick

 

• 

  twintipteles

• Dec 31, 1969

nice rail, kinda ridiculous jump.

 

• 

  Snowcase

• Dec 31, 1969

not at all that is the jump there is nothing below the shot. just take a look at the supoort lower the jump doesn't even come to there. you also have to take into account the poor conditions

 

T

• T

  TimothyLord

• Dec 31, 1969

did u photshop this at all because the jump looks way out of prortion to the rail

 

S

• S

  SBG*

• Dec 31, 1969

sick

 

• 

  Calrin

• Dec 31, 1969

yeah the jump was actually really low. just look at it in reationship with the rail.

 

• 

  cottonwoodarmada1651

• Dec 31, 1969

looking at it in relation with the rail i see that the jump is half the height of the rail. maybe you had a bad inrun, but that's big.

 

• 

  cottonwoodarmada1651

• Dec 31, 1969

^that being said, i can't see the inrun and the rail is kinda mellow, so it's probably justified. just don't argue that it's "really low." nice rail and good picture by the way.

 

• 

  MattMcGinnis

• Dec 31, 1969

na, its definitely not big at all, we try to stick with the quebec rule and its about the hieght of two stairs.

 

• 

  Snowcase

• Dec 31, 1969