People still do switch 1080's? Next time please do the jump AVEC LE STEEZ. Next time I would like to see an upside down 1080 and you land switch on your helmet. That would be truly avec steez. And after you land on your helmet, keep spinning like you were a breakdancer.
Breakdancing is so 2003. What I want to see is more modern intepretations of classical music, utilizing moves like the Bio 9. I'm not entirely sure what that is, but it sounds quite scientific. Mmmmm, music and science, together. Your jump was awesome and totally gnar, mad steez guy
Avec le steez is so last post. Get over it Avec Le Steez 2003 and stop trying to live your scientific life through skiing. The Pope of Skiing doesn't truly believe in the cross-mixation of science and skiing. Its sort of like the trueness of entropy. Also, breakdancing is totally gnarred out. Also, TJ....good work on your gnarness.
The pope of skiing (I assume you're referring to my dad) actually actively promotes the cross-mixation of science and all things. He is very scientific, loves science, and may in fact marry science if it's ok with my mom. TJ I liked it when you jumped backwards, that was pretty gnar.
Ok, AVEC LE CHEEZE 2003, the weirdest thing just happened in my brain. I noticed you referring to the Pope of Skiing as your dad, and how he actively promotes the cross mixation. Funny thing is, my dad is the Pope of Skiing. But he doesn't promote. Could it be that he is leading two seperate lives with 2 steez fronts? J'ai confused. In the mid 1600's, Robert Boyle studied the relationship between the pressure (p) and the volume (V) of a confined gas held at a constant temperature. Boyle observed that the product of the pressure and volume are observed to be nearly constant. The product of pressure and volume is exactly a constant for an ideal gas.
p * V = constant
This relationship between pressure and volume is called Boyle's Law in his honor.
But scientifically speaking, the volume expelled by my rear coincides with my level of steez. (i.e. a large volume - we're not talking inversely proportional here)
