ski8990 Dec 31, 1969 The sequence is kinda skecthy cause it was a tough angle to make a sequence from.
ol_vt_g Dec 31, 1969 HA! i knew i recognized that for some reason, then i saw who posted it and location, and i was like voila! i know where it is, but right now couldn't tell you if my life depended it. Goddamnit i need to go skiing. memory refresher pls
HA! i knew i recognized that for some reason, then i saw who posted it and location, and i was like voila! i know where it is, but right now couldn't tell you if my life depended it. Goddamnit i need to go skiing. memory refresher pls
ski8990 Dec 31, 1969 haha except if I multiplied by 40% i would get a number smaller than the actual size of the cliff because that is the same by multiplying by .4, and I think from the peak of my jump to where I landed was at least 15 feet
haha except if I multiplied by 40% i would get a number smaller than the actual size of the cliff because that is the same by multiplying by .4, and I think from the peak of my jump to where I landed was at least 15 feet
