Download-My-Apps Dec 31, 1969 might be just the angle but it almost looks like he'shigher than the bridge, which makes me agree with fr4nt167.
might be just the angle but it almost looks like he'shigher than the bridge, which makes me agree with fr4nt167.
madtrixman Dec 31, 1969 you guys are dumbass! the camera is pretty far from the bridge, and at the bottom too....so when it shots at the top of the bridge, it looks like hes higher than the bridge....soooooo sick pic!
you guys are dumbass! the camera is pretty far from the bridge, and at the bottom too....so when it shots at the top of the bridge, it looks like hes higher than the bridge....soooooo sick pic!
C.R.420 Dec 31, 1969 'It's definitely the camera angle. If you look at it closely, you'll notice that he's prolly a good 15 ft below the top of the bridge.' ^^what? no it doesnt
'It's definitely the camera angle. If you look at it closely, you'll notice that he's prolly a good 15 ft below the top of the bridge.' ^^what? no it doesnt
