T T T_Ruster Dec 31, 1969 maybe if he did more than 4 hits and spun different directions....tanner was spinning both directions and got 7 hits
maybe if he did more than 4 hits and spun different directions....tanner was spinning both directions and got 7 hits
T T T-Sin Dec 31, 1969 ^^^well Tanner Only spun a left side spin once and then simon got a tail in his 12 and was going higher than tanner...and he got 5 hits in...i just thought it could go either way...but should have been closer than 93-91
^^^well Tanner Only spun a left side spin once and then simon got a tail in his 12 and was going higher than tanner...and he got 5 hits in...i just thought it could go either way...but should have been closer than 93-91
skihillraod Dec 31, 1969 they should have put simon up top and made tanner beat him on the last run, that is just espn's fault for bad television.
they should have put simon up top and made tanner beat him on the last run, that is just espn's fault for bad television.
Bentley@DOSMedia Dec 31, 1969 well tanner spun both ways... while simon went 5+ feet bigger every hit. both are major components of the scores. so if you think about it. anyone has an argument for both.
well tanner spun both ways... while simon went 5+ feet bigger every hit. both are major components of the scores. so if you think about it. anyone has an argument for both.
